Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:15:05 10/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2005 at 11:30:07, Greg Simpson wrote: >On October 03, 2005 at 10:18:30, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 03, 2005 at 10:02:38, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >> >>>I am running a match between Fritz 9 and Fruit 2.2 right now. >>> >>>- Hardware: AMD Athon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2300 MHz, 2 GB RAM. >>>- Hash tables: 512 MB each >>>- Own books >>>- Permanent brain (2 CPU system!) >>>- Time: 60+15 >>>- Length: 50 games >>> >>> >>>After 42 games, Fruit 2.2 is leading with a powerful 28:14! >>> >>>I will publish the games after the 50 games are finished. >>> >>>I know that 50 games are not really enough for a clear evaluation of an engine's >>>playing strength. But it looks like Fruit is the major contender for the #1 spot >>>on the rating list. >>> >>>Andreas >> >>I wonder if the reason is not a bad book of Fritz because in CEGT I do not see >>similiar results. >> >>Uri > >It's beginning to look like Fritz 9 is more aggressive than the other top >programs, which is giving it very high scores against weak engines but leaving >it weaker head-to-head against the very best. It may be the case for Fritz with it's own book but Fritz9 in CEGT scored more than 50% against Fruit2.1 +18 =18 -17 http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ranglisteall.html#2
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.