Author: KarinsDad
Date: 18:09:19 03/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 07, 1999 at 16:07:29, blass uri wrote: > >On March 07, 1999 at 11:47:42, KarinsDad wrote: > > >>Yes, but Kasparov had a loss in that tournament whereas Anand and Kramnik did >>not. Yes, he did win the tournament, but if the computer helped him out so much, >>why did he not win it by more than .5 (or even by 1 in an attempt to beat >>Kramnik?)? > >There is a simple possible explanation. > >The computer also helped other players and everyone is better because of the >computer. > >Uri I have no doubt of this. You cannot stay at that level of performance without using every advantage possible. KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.