Author: Swaminathan
Date: 06:31:44 10/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2005 at 02:39:18, Graham Banks wrote: >On October 04, 2005 at 02:26:06, James Constance wrote: > >>Graham >> >>Are you saying no more in your role as a moderator or just commenting as a >>poster? I think you should make it clear, or some confusion may arise. >> >>If you were moderating, I think you ought to consider moderating a bit less. >> >>regards >> >>James >> >Hi James, > >fair enough question. A bit of both really! >Complaints were received regarding a flood of such posts. I was trying to be >polite about it. >Be aware that members contact us in confidence and we have to make a decision as >a team without other members always being aware of certain things. Some >decisions don't go down well, but that's the life of a moderator! >I've been advised to use email a bit more and post less in moderating (also a >fair request), so that should hopefully please you and some others! >There are always teething problems when new moderators take over and the sudden >influx of 'trolls' is not making it any easier. >We are trying to do our best, > >Regards, Graham. Graham, I agree with your idea of making this forum a bit nicer. But you must give fair deal to people regarding banning issue Chris Conkie has made the post that are perfectly acceptable for testing engines,[FRC chess is allowed,so why not pieces on board chess to test engines?] It seems to me that you are going to ban Chris Conkie if he makes some more posts on the same stuff. Lessen your moderation warning to people. Swami >> >>On October 03, 2005 at 19:58:29, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>Chris has made his point and we'll leave it at that. >>> >>>Regards, Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.