Author: Michael Yee
Date: 08:59:13 10/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2005 at 03:56:18, chandler yergin wrote: >On October 03, 2005 at 22:47:01, Michael Yee wrote: > >>On October 03, 2005 at 16:50:24, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On October 03, 2005 at 16:25:25, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On October 03, 2005 at 16:20:59, Gerald Grimsley wrote: >>>> >>>>>Somewhere a few years ago I saw some "formula" for that based on the limited >>>>>number of human-computer games. >>>>>Thanks in advance, >>>>>Gerald >>>> >>>>I think the "approximate" conversion is 1:1 >>>> >>>>Joachim >>> >>>There are ELO's for Humans, and ELO's for Computers. >> >>I think your statement's mostly true. Except that in the case of the SSDF list, >>they had some humans play some computers sometime in the past. So there's a >>(weak) bridge between the two pools of players (and their ratings). >> >>Michael > >Here's an old Link, for now... >Hope it helps.. >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1141 Thanks for the link. I think the SSDF ratings could be better calibrated to FIDE ratings if it included all other human-comp games that have been played. The only issue would be the different hardware setups used. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.