Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Collector's Corner..Resurrection-Fruit 05 VS. Tasc R40 V2.5 Game 10/10

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 12:15:42 10/04/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 04, 2005 at 14:41:42, Murat wrote:

>On October 04, 2005 at 12:19:15, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>
>>Why do you think that it is too high.
>>
>>Fritz3 achieved the IM norm on a P90 mhz machine
>>so it seems that it was in the level of near 2400.
>>
>In my opinion chess computer ratings are inflated. Assuming computer chess elo
>vs FIDE elo is 1:1 more or less this will put resurrection in top 20 on the FIDE
>list.
>
>Now if a 200MHZ machine gives us 2700 elo, what will a 3.8GHz with 512 meg of
>hash give? 2900 elo perhaps?  I don’t think the ELO curve is linear like that
>.We are using this high ELO numbers too loosely.
>
>I would like to see the computers participate in human tournaments to get their
>ELO rating.  I don’t really like the computer vs computer matches for
>determining its ELO because the starting reference for the first rated program
>is questionable.
>
>Thank you for listening
>
>Murat :.

Unfortunately it seems that there is no interest to see computers play in human
tournament and computers are simply not allowed to play against humans.

Note that I would like to see computers in the world championship when the human
world champion is decided based on the total points both against humans and
computers but unfortunately I think that it will never happen.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.