Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: UCI protocol question

Author: Joachim Rang

Date: 06:17:46 10/05/05

Go up one level in this thread

On October 05, 2005 at 06:49:42, Alex Schmidt wrote:

>Hello Joachim,
>
>> If the game is over just take the last eval and decide whether it is a loss, draw or win.
>
>It is not so easy for an engine to find the end of a game in the UCI protocol.
>The 'missing' result in the UCI protocol is the reason for some WB engine
>programmers not to implement UCI.
>
>Best,
>Alex

I read controversial claims. Some say it is not possible or at least not easy
other they it is easy to detect. As a non-programmer I think one could just
check whether the next position to search is a legal game continuation. If it is
not the previous game is over.

Joachim

• Re: UCI protocol question Alex Schmidt 06:53:49 10/05/05
  • Re: UCI protocol question Dieter Buerssner 11:08:40 10/05/05
• Re: UCI protocol question Tord Romstad 06:32:09 10/05/05
  • Re: UCI protocol question Tord Romstad 06:36:52 10/05/05
    • Re: UCI protocol question Vincent Diepeveen 07:06:16 10/05/05
      • Re: UCI protocol question Tord Romstad 07:25:41 10/05/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.