Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Everyone....Karpov Still Has a Point

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 16:51:47 10/06/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 06, 2005 at 19:35:23, Roger D Davis wrote:

>On October 06, 2005 at 11:53:05, Terry McCracken wrote:
>
>>He may be dismissing computer chess too lightly, but I've watched players on ICC
>>who were NOT GMs and obtain winning positions against these "silicon brutes",
>>and often they're losses are on time. The games were 15/0  or small time
>>increments. These favour machines, still I've seen them burn but escape due to
>>the bell.
>>
>>There are  people here who do in fact beat programs, and we know this to be
>>true.
>>
>>Anand never took the matches between Kramnik and Fritz too seriously or Kasparov
>>matches with Deep Junior or Deep Fritz. If you really look at those games, you
>>can see both Kramnik and Kasparov dominating these beasts, but for what ever
>>reason they messed up in even and also won positions, more than once.
>>So those matches don't mean as much as you think. Sure the machines were strong,
>>but in no way better than either of these grandmasters.
>>
>>Hydra is the only _real_ exception, and even here, GM Nichols with a computer
>>was beating it at corr. GM Topolov had it beat and let it slip to a draw.
>>There's a stronger ver. now but I suspect a top GM on a good day who plays
>>computers often, could win a game, even a match, but I suspect after GM Adams
>>poor performance we might not see such an event. What a shame.
>>
>>Machines are NOT completely dominating the top humans or very experienced
>>computer players, at least not yet.  Say what you will, but the losses are often
>>due to oversights that make the machines look better than the actually are.
>>
>>That's my two cents.
>>
>>Terry
>
>Maybe humans should be allowed to take back an oversight when they play
>computers. At least 1 oversight per game. More than that and they deserve to
>lose.
>
>Roger

You are joking yes? Well that would really favour the grandmasters;-)
I also think their egos wouldn't let them accept these terms.

Terry



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.