Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 23:57:25 10/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2005 at 19:30:56, SprudelPudel wrote: >Well... Fabian changed from the GPL to a what-ever-licence... As the GNU.org FAQ >write: > >Of course the programmer can do it. but he will lose his standing in the >community... This is complete BS, because Fruit is 100% Fabiens original work. It would be another thing if several people have contributed to a project, but this is not the case with Fruit. >This exactly what I think. Sorry Fab, please read your own rationals for not >implementing TB's on wbec-ridderkerk.nl > ><quote> >The reasons for my decision are: > >- the source code by Eugene Nalimov is not "free of use" > (although you don't have to pay for it) ></quote> > >Regards... Well, he was not able to distribute Nalimovs code under GPL. Now he can. I think you should stop accusing people who share their "hard work" for a good price to the community. I personally find this disgusting. regards Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.