Author: Stephen A. Boak
Date: 10:47:54 10/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2005 at 10:24:51, Joachim Rang wrote: >On October 08, 2005 at 09:20:48, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On October 08, 2005 at 09:14:07, David Dahlem wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2005 at 09:03:04, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>Posted on CTF >>>> >>>>"IMO the success of Fruit is its simplicity, a clean straight search with little >>>>whistles and bells and balanced (but yet limited) chess knowledge. I have >>>>compiled the 2.1 sources and it gave an 80Kb executable, simply amazing." >>>> >>>>Ed Schröder >>>> >>>>High praise from one of the world's best renowned chess programmers. >>>> >>>>Kudos to Fruit's programming team. >>>> >>>>best, >>>> >>>>Michael >>> >>>The Fruit 2.2 executable is 632kb. Is this due to the compiler used? >>> >>>Regards >>>Dave >> >>It's probably the security coding ;>) (just kidding - I have no clue actually.) > >In fact it is. :-) The unprotected Binary from Bryan is 188KB but the protection >code is about 500 KB. I don't know why this is needed but that is what I get >after protection. > >Joachim Probably just a compression ration less than 1.0. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.