Author: adam wilks
Date: 12:02:13 10/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
I firstly pasted my first game v s9.1 yesterday with all logs ect but it came up and seemed unreadable on here so decided for everyone`s easy viewing that i`ll delete the logs and just paste the pgn instead. That`s honest. Secondly, you may all wonder if something fishy is going on. The truth is i played my first 5 min game on 1MB hash as i thought i might have a better chance of winning. So that`s what was fishy. Shredder still played reasonable moves though. Qg2 was one of my best moves ever. The game is posted on ccc a few days back. The second game was weird. I expected to do well after unexpectadely winning the first but not to gain such an overwhelming position after thinking i had taken the anti-chess theory to far. Realising my score was -11.00 at one stage. Shredder played cxb3 and it DID come up in the log with a search depth of 4 and played it! THIS IS FACT. Maybe as it was running low on time because of my "unsound moves". After i played g6 shredder was in trouble and this was confirmed by its evaluation going from -/+11.00 to +/- 10.00 in a matter of 2 moves. I actually freaked out when it played cxb3 and considered Qd6 or Bd6 the strongest. I honestly think shredder played a bad move as a result of limited time and a possible poor king safety evaluation which is always the hardest element for a program to understand.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.