Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anti-computer v Shredder 9.1UCI

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 14:16:24 10/09/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 09, 2005 at 15:54:13, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On October 09, 2005 at 13:39:04, Günther Simon wrote:
>
>>Can you show a win after the move Bd6, because this
>>is the move S9.1 really wants to play, of course it never
>>ever considers the crappy cxb3??
>
>I don't know what happened, neither do I have Shredder 9. However, Shredder
>Paderborn can move extremely fast in seemingly "easy move" situations. Now and
>then the judgement of the move as an easy move was dubious. Uri has shown that
>Shredder does consider the move at low depth.
>
>Regards,
>Dieter

I know who 'Adam Wilks'(alias MightyDuck) really is and for me it is
clear this move was forced in zero seconds.
The hash bug _I_ have proven for Shredder BTW is very seldom.
Read also Kurts post please, because this is only one of various
dubious moves, which will be played in a _real_ 5 minute blitz game.
I bet we will never see a log nor a debug nor a commented pgn.

Regards,
Guenther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.