Author: Günther Simon
Date: 14:18:10 10/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2005 at 17:16:24, Günther Simon wrote: >On October 09, 2005 at 15:54:13, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On October 09, 2005 at 13:39:04, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>Can you show a win after the move Bd6, because this >>>is the move S9.1 really wants to play, of course it never >>>ever considers the crappy cxb3?? >> >>I don't know what happened, neither do I have Shredder 9. However, Shredder >>Paderborn can move extremely fast in seemingly "easy move" situations. Now and >>then the judgement of the move as an easy move was dubious. Uri has shown that >>Shredder does consider the move at low depth. >> >>Regards, >>Dieter > >I know who 'Adam Wilks'(alias MightyDuck) really is and for me it is >clear this move was forced in zero seconds. >The hash bug _I_ have proven for Shredder BTW is very seldom. >Read also Kurts post please, because this is only one of various >dubious moves, which will ->not(of course) >be played in a _real_ 5 minute blitz game. >I bet we will never see a log nor a debug nor a commented pgn. > >Regards, >Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.