Author: chandler yergin
Date: 14:38:55 10/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2005 at 14:34:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On October 09, 2005 at 12:45:10, adam wilks wrote: > >>[Event "Blitz:5'"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "2005.10.09"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "Adam.W"] >>[Black "Shredder 9.1 UCI, Chess"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[ECO "A00"] >>[PlyCount "53"] >> >>1. h4 e5 2. b3 Nf6 3. Bb2 d6 4. d4 exd4 5. Bxd4 Be7 6. Nd2 O-O 7. h5 h6 8. Be3 >>Nc6 9. Ngf3 Nd5 10. Bxh6 Nc3 11. Qc1 gxh6 12. Nc4 d5 13. Qxh6 dxc4 14. g4 Nb4 >>15. Bh3 Nxc2+ 16. Kf1 Nxa1 17. g5 Bxh3+ 18. Rxh3 Qd7 19. Kg2 cxb3 20. g6 Qg4+ >>21. Rg3 fxg6 22. Rxg4 Rf6 23. hxg6 Bc5 24. Rh4 Rxg6+ 25. Qxg6+ Kf8 26. Rh7 bxa2 >>27. Qf7# 1-0 >> >>When shredder played 19.cxb3 i felt i had gained a free tempo via g6 effectively >>securing a win. > > A game that simply is impossible to play in > this way vs Shredder 9.1 UCI at TC 5' as > there are so many anti-Shredder-moves in it :-( > Kurt Gentlemen: I should remind you that just a few years ago, it was well known that if White just played the Stonewall i.e. Pawns on Q4 e3 f4 against all the Top Programs on ICC it was fairly easy to crush Black on the Kingside. A frind of mine handle Chesscat.. now inactive, was just a 1900 USCF Rated Player, but boosted his ICC Rating to over 2400 doing exactly that.. and in Blitz!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.