Author: Albert Silver
Date: 15:03:39 10/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2005 at 16:33:42, Kai Skibbe wrote:
>On October 09, 2005 at 12:41:57, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>As I've been testing the various engines on the PDA, and I just acquired Pocket
>>Grandmaster that has further engines available, I decided to do a quick
>>comparison on Fruit 2.1 running on PGM as opposed to CEBoard.
>>
>>I admit I only did this testing expecting a maximum difference of a couple of
>>percent, since they were both running identically, with 8MB hash. However the
>>results were quite different. Fruit 2.1 running on CEBoard was consistently
>>about 40% faster in a half dozen test positions. I can test more, but I don't
>>expect any change in results. When Fruit achieved 45kns in CEBoard, it would
>>achieve 32 in PGM, and this was apparent at all times.
>>
>>I found this quite surprising and wonder the reason.
>>
>> Albert
>
>Hi Albert,
>
>I don´t know why Fruit-CEBoard is faster. Maybe it´s compiled with different
>and better compiler optimizations.
>
>Kai
I know very little about this, so the person to ask would have to be Zanchetta.
All the same, he explains the process at his site, since he offers an
'integration package' (http://www.zanchetta.net/CEBoard/CEBoard.aspx#package)
with details on preparing an engine for use with CEBoard.
BTW, any chance Toga could be made available for PGM as well?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.