Author: Peter Berger
Date: 16:03:39 10/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2005 at 18:47:36, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On October 09, 2005 at 18:43:19, Peter Berger wrote: > >>Dieter, I have analyzed this position with Yace for about a day :) . Wait until >>Yace gets much deeper to see it drop to 0.0 . > >Ok. I have seen this dropping to 0.0 with Yace PB. I had analysed it many times >- I came to the conclusion: no bug, just too tricky. I thought, this was gone >with 0.99.87. I had tried without TBs, but using all 3 and 4-men bitbases + >kppkp. > >Cheers, >Dieter Hmm, maybe I spoilt this one posting-wise or made some wrong assumptions. Wild 7 is tricky *for sure* , but I don't think Chandler's position really is. Chandler and me disagreed on evaluation of his position. We needed only three moves in a testgame to agree with each other though. 1. a5 Ka6 2. Kg2 f4 3. Kf3 1-0 Not so deep, or is it ? So yes, this one is a win for white too, something I didn't want to post, as Shredder hates the white position that much. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.