Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Anti-computer v Shredder 9.1UCI

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 05:28:05 10/10/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 10, 2005 at 03:25:21, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On October 09, 2005 at 17:38:55, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>> Gentlemen:
>>I should remind you that just a few years ago, it was well known that
>>if  White  just played the Stonewall i.e. Pawns on Q4 e3 f4 against
>>all the Top Programs on ICC it was fairly easy to crush Black on the Kingside.
>>A frind of mine handle Chesscat.. now inactive, was just a 1900 USCF Rated
>>Player, but boosted his ICC Rating to over 2400 doing exactly that.. and in
>>Blitz!
>
>      This may all be true. But fact is that Adam's
>      game has obviously not been played at time
>      control blitz 5' against Shredder 9.1 UCI
>      as many moves would never have been chosen
>      by this program.
>      Kurt

  Sorry Kurt, you don't know that!

http://computer.howstuffworks.com/chess2.htm

The Diagram is a simple 3 Level Tree

Quoting:
"The computer is playing as the white player. The black player has moved and
left the board position at the top of the tree. In this tree, white can make
three possible moves. From each of those three possible moves, black can make
three possible moves. From each of those nine board positions, white can make
two possible moves. (In real life, the total number of moves from any position
is 20 or so, but that would be hard to draw.) "To decide what to do, the
computer looks at this tree and works upward from the bottom. Its calculations
are set up so that it finds the best board positions from each of the possible
positions black will take (it takes the maximum): "Finally, it takes the maximum
of the top three numbers: 7. That is the move the computer will make. Once black
makes its move, the computer goes through this whole process again, generating a
new tree and evaluating all of the board positions to figure out its next
move."This approach is called the minimax algorithm because it alternates
between the maximums and minimums as it moves up the tree."
"The key thing to keep in mind, however, is that this is nothing like human
thought. When we learn how human thinking works and create a computer that uses
those techniques to play chess, we will really be onto something... "

Give the young man some Credit! He played very well!
The Computer plays as above..
Your comment sounds like 'sour grapes'.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.