Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:14:10 10/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2005 at 08:21:35, chandler yergin wrote: >On October 09, 2005 at 23:15:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 09, 2005 at 18:55:13, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>http://amici.iccf.com/issues/issue_03/issue_03_m_gilbert.html >> >>of course because the mate is not correct. > >Ha Haaaa For example just when did chest 'find' this Mate? >Did it announce it 35 moves in advance? >Didn't think so. >Sorry Uri, don't try and deprecate her marvelous achievement! You miss the point if white plays 70.Kd5 then it is mate in 36 from the root position and not mate in 35. She never saw forced mate in 35 and simply played against herself and got it but she did not play the best moves for both sides. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.