Author: chandler yergin
Date: 07:28:36 10/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2005 at 10:14:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 10, 2005 at 08:21:35, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On October 09, 2005 at 23:15:09, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On October 09, 2005 at 18:55:13, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://amici.iccf.com/issues/issue_03/issue_03_m_gilbert.html
>>>
>>>of course because the mate is not correct.
>>
>>Ha Haaaa For example just when did chest 'find' this Mate?
>>Did it announce it 35 moves in advance?
>>Didn't think so.
>>Sorry Uri, don't try and deprecate her marvelous achievement!
>
>You miss the point
>if white plays 70.Kd5 then it is mate in 36 from the root position and not mate
>in 35.
Oh there's that word again "IF"
>She never saw forced mate in 35
Obviously she did!
and simply played against herself and got it but
>she did not play the best moves for both sides.
She's not a Computer. Analyze ANY Game and you will see that neither player
plays the best moves.
What is your point?
Except to demean a truly amazing feat of human calculation?
Correspondence play without Computer assist.
She found the Mate.
Amazing wouldn't you agree?
>
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.