Author: Joseph Tadeusz
Date: 02:19:50 10/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2005 at 04:08:36, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >For the information Fruit_21_static for linux was 617kb while the self compiled >fruit21 was 100kb. >So the file size of fruit22 in my opinion is _not_ due to the security code but >from static linking to run on many different systems. Fruit 2.2 is certainly less compatible. Fruit 2.1 runs perfectly on my SuSE 7.0, but 2.2 gives: user@linux:~/fruit_22 > ./fruit_22 FATAL: kernel too old Segmentation fault I didn't buy it and didn't intend to. It looks they sacrificed compatibility for security.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.