Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 02:47:22 10/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2005 at 05:19:50, Joseph Tadeusz wrote: >On October 11, 2005 at 04:08:36, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>For the information Fruit_21_static for linux was 617kb while the self compiled >>fruit21 was 100kb. >>So the file size of fruit22 in my opinion is _not_ due to the security code but >>from static linking to run on many different systems. > > >Fruit 2.2 is certainly less compatible. > >Fruit 2.1 runs perfectly on my SuSE 7.0, but 2.2 gives: > > user@linux:~/fruit_22 > ./fruit_22 > FATAL: kernel too old > Segmentation fault > >I didn't buy it and didn't intend to. > >It looks they sacrificed compatibility for security. that is certainly not the case. The Linux-Binary 2.2 was compiled with GCC since there was no one available with the Intel-compiler. I think it is an issue with the Compiler. Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.