Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Would anyone agree that,,

Author: chandler yergin

Date: 07:22:59 10/11/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 11, 2005 at 06:23:15, Richard Pijl wrote:

>On October 10, 2005 at 23:14:53, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>The following are also used by Top Programs:
>>Negamax Search
>>Analysis Function
>>Iterative Deepening
>>Alpha-Beta Pruning
>>Principal Variation Search
>>Aspiration Windows
>>Transposition Table
>>Killer Moves
>>History Heuristic
>>Quiescence Search
>>Quiescence Width Extensions
>>Bitboards
>>Internal Iterative Deepening
>>Null Move Heuristic
>>Futility Pruning
>>Razoring
>>Search Extensions
>>Static Evaluation
>
>If you want to ask if all top-programs use all the mechanisms the answer is
>clearly no
>
>if you wanted to ask if all of the mechanisms are used by one or more
>top-programs the answer is likely yes. Things that are not used by all programs
>are e.g. Principle Variation Search, Quiescence Width Extensions, Bitboards,
>Futility Pruning, Razoring and probably more.
>In the Baron I'm _not_ using Razoring and Futility Pruning.

Richard.

Thanks for the input..
I have been involved in past discussions where other Posters
misinterpreted what I Posted simply we were comparing 'apples & oranges'
so to speak. I realize not everyone uses chessbase, and its functions
and terminology may mean something different to them.
Without a baseline as a guide; without complete understanding of what
I am writing, it just causes controversy and long threads.
I'm trying to take this one step at a time to avoid this.
OK?
Thanks,
Chan



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.