Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: As i suspected, a desperate try at something better than Fruit 2.2

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 06:04:32 10/12/05

Go up one level in this thread

On October 12, 2005 at 08:14:16, robert flesher wrote:

>It also lost against default 14-6, however I will give it a 100 game match to
>make sure. Although it seems that this version is even more aggressive compared
>to the defaul and this is exactly what Fruit 2.2 is exploiting.

I do not understand why you suspect about us being desperate...I am only
reporting tests of settings for Shredder 9...people here reported on many
setting  for CM1000 and nobody thought someone was desperate...

??????????????

Sandro

• Re: As i suspected, a desperate try at something better than Fruit 2.2 gerold daniels 11:07:17 10/12/05
  • Re: As i suspected, a desperate try at something better than Fruit 2.2 Sandro Necchi 14:18:56 10/12/05
• Re: As i suspected, a GOOD try at something better than Fruit 2.2 robert flesher 06:30:21 10/12/05
  • Re: As i suspected, a GOOD try at something better than Fruit 2.2 Sandro Necchi 08:27:21 10/12/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.