Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:29:29 10/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2005 at 09:01:46, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On October 12, 2005 at 08:58:09, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On October 12, 2005 at 08:14:16, robert flesher wrote: >> >>>It also lost against default 14-6, however I will give it a 100 game match to >>>make sure. Although it seems that this version is even more aggressive compared >>>to the defaul and this is exactly what Fruit 2.2 is exploiting. >> >>Maybe the problem is one computer only. >> >>Using 2 computers after 42 games CE 9g is leading 21.5 to 20.5 (at 15 minuts >>each on 2 AMD 3000+ with 256Mega RAM) so I do not understand your results. >> >>Sandro > >Leading against Shredder 9...I do not test against Fruit 2.2 because I do not >own it due to the hated protection used. > >Some people reported a clear win against Fruit 2.2 so maybe it is a matter of >openings... > >Sandro Note that initially I thought that the copy protection of fruit is a good idea but I changed my mind about it after reading responses of people. It is possible that even piracy without that copy protection may be productive for Fabien. Explanation: option 1:copy protection similiar to shredder A buy the program and share the program with B,C,D,E when everybody payed only 1/5 of the price. Fabien earns 35$ A,B,C,D,E pay 7$ option 2:copy protection based on hardwate A does not buy fruit because it is too expensive and same for B,C,D,E Fabien earns nothing. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.