Author: gerold daniels
Date: 10:16:11 10/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2005 at 11:46:47, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On October 12, 2005 at 09:29:29, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 12, 2005 at 09:01:46, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>>On October 12, 2005 at 08:58:09, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>>>On October 12, 2005 at 08:14:16, robert flesher wrote: >>>> >>>>>It also lost against default 14-6, however I will give it a 100 game match to >>>>>make sure. Although it seems that this version is even more aggressive compared >>>>>to the defaul and this is exactly what Fruit 2.2 is exploiting. >>>> >>>>Maybe the problem is one computer only. >>>> >>>>Using 2 computers after 42 games CE 9g is leading 21.5 to 20.5 (at 15 minuts >>>>each on 2 AMD 3000+ with 256Mega RAM) so I do not understand your results. >>>> >>>>Sandro >>> >>>Leading against Shredder 9...I do not test against Fruit 2.2 because I do not >>>own it due to the hated protection used. >>> >>>Some people reported a clear win against Fruit 2.2 so maybe it is a matter of >>>openings... >>> >>>Sandro >> >>Note that initially I thought that the copy protection of fruit is a good idea >>but I changed my mind about it after reading responses of people. > >I know, but I have been in the computer/software enough to guess the >outcome...so this is not surprise to me. > >> >>It is possible that even piracy without that copy protection may be productive >>for Fabien. >> >>Explanation: >> >>option 1:copy protection similiar to shredder >>A buy the program and share the program with B,C,D,E when everybody payed only >>1/5 of the price. >> >>Fabien earns 35$ >>A,B,C,D,E pay 7$ > >I think the price is not a problem, but the idea to expect everything for free >is. This is why I am against free software (for chess) because people will get >used to the idea of getting software for free. >I think the programmers need to get money also as a return for their work. >The problem in my case is that even if I accept this I am willing to buy >software that comply to my needs. One of them is the freedom to deinstall the >software anytime I want and install it anytime I want. This kind of protection >does not comply to it even if the distributor may be so kind to send me extra >protections. > Free chess programs makes chess more popular so more people will buy. If it wasn't for crafty and other free programs a lot of people would not play or buy any chess related products. Do you use any free software yourself. :) Gerold. >> >>option 2:copy protection based on hardwate >> >>A does not buy fruit because it is too expensive and same for B,C,D,E >>Fabien earns nothing. >> >>Uri > >Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.