Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:09:15 10/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2005 at 15:29:46, Thomas Logan wrote: >On October 12, 2005 at 15:11:58, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On October 12, 2005 at 08:32:37, Ray Banks wrote: >> >>>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/tabellen/eccentric.htm >>> >>>Shredder Eccentric lost to FruitWCCC'05 (Fruit 2.2) 20.5 - 29.5 in CEGT testing. >>>This was also worse than Shredder default. >> >>Sandro's setting comes in at 2766 behind fruit 2.2 and fritz 9 >>ahead of default >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rangliste.html#2 > >The setting was +5 -4 =11 against Fritz 9 >> >>Tom The setting also has +7 =9 -4 against CM10th Pestilence You should look at the following link http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ranglisteall.html I guess that the bad results against Pestilence reduce shredder's rating(otherwise it could be above Fritz9) inspite of the fact that the result against pestilence is better than the result of default shredder it is still worse than results of Fruit2.2 and Fritz9 I tried to look at the results of pestilence and surprisingly I find that it scored +6 =3 -1 against enginexyz when enginexyz is not in the list http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ranglisteall.html#10 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.