Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: As i suspected, a desperate try at something better than Fruit 2.2

Author: Sandro Necchi

Date: 14:18:56 10/12/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 12, 2005 at 14:07:17, gerold daniels wrote:

>On October 12, 2005 at 09:04:32, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>
>>On October 12, 2005 at 08:14:16, robert flesher wrote:
>>
>>>It also lost against default 14-6, however I will give it a 100 game match to
>>>make sure. Although it seems that this version is even more aggressive compared
>>>to the defaul and this is exactly what Fruit 2.2 is exploiting.
>>
>>I do not understand why you suspect about us being desperate...I am only
>>reporting tests of settings for Shredder 9...people here reported on many
>>setting  for CM1000 and nobody thought someone was desperate...
>>
>>??????????????
>>
>>Sandro
>
>Your hard work is very much appreciated.
>
>Gerold.

Thanks...unfortunately computer chess and chess is a "bad illiness"...

Sandro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.