Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Toga 1.0 and the bad bishop

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 03:26:05 10/13/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 13, 2005 at 03:02:45, Ryan B. wrote:

>I think it is a known issue that Toga, just like Fruit that it is based on,
>knows very little about stratrgy and plays off being a great searcher.


No

I think that evaluation is one of the big advantage of fruit relative to
opponents and not search.

I have examples when Fruit simply evaluate position better than commercial
programs.


  Becuase
>it is an open source program you could add to the eval but it will slow down the
>search some for each thing added.  In computer chess it is still tactics over
>strategy, never mind the so called "positional" chess programs.

I disagree.
I think that there are lot of positions that fruit understand better than
commercial programs(see the case of the exchange sacrifice that I mentioned)

Fruit is also not a fast solver of nolot 1 or nolot 2 so I do not think it's
relative advantage to the commercial programs is tactics.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.