Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result

Author: Clive Munro

Date: 01:41:34 10/15/05

Go up one level in this thread

Hi Kurt

Yes it was interesting. However it became apparent quite early on that is was a
bit of a mismatch on hardware terns. Mark Uniacke said that a closer hardware
comparison could be made if I were using a 486/66. He said even a 400MHz T3
would have had trouble against a P166!

Best regards

Clive

• Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Albert Silver 08:23:52 10/15/05
• Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Albert Silver 08:22:37 10/15/05
  • Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Clive Munro 09:10:21 10/15/05
    • Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Albert Silver 22:21:54 10/15/05
      • Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Clive Munro 02:20:38 10/16/05
• Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Albert Silver 08:21:08 10/15/05
• Palm ve PC chip strength estimations? O. Veli 03:39:38 10/15/05
• Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Kurt Utzinger 01:51:45 10/15/05
  • Re: Palm Hiarcs V Fruit 2.1 the result Clive Munro 03:42:38 10/15/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.