Author: Albert Silver
Date: 08:23:52 10/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2005 at 04:41:34, Clive Munro wrote: >Hi Kurt > >Yes it was interesting. However it became apparent quite early on that is was a >bit of a mismatch on hardware terns. Mark Uniacke said that a closer hardware >comparison could be made if I were using a 486/66. He said even a 400MHz T3 >would have had trouble against a P166! > >Best regards > >Clive Yes, as I explained earlier when you first announced this, the processors aren't remotely comparable. For example Fruit on my PPC running at 624 MHz is about 15-16 times slower than on a 2 Ghz Athlon, both using the same hash size. I have posted the results of several test positions, so you might compare the results you get on your P166. Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.