Author: Albert Silver
Date: 22:21:54 10/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2005 at 12:10:21, Clive Munro wrote:
>
>>
>>Yes, as I explained earlier when you first announced this, the processors aren't
>>remotely comparable. For example Fruit on my PPC running at 624 MHz is about
>>15-16 times slower than on a 2 Ghz Athlon, both using the same hash size.
>>
>>I have posted the results of several test positions, so you might compare the
>>results you get on your P166.
>>
>>Albert
>
>Yes Albert, I would have to agree that the PC processors certainly seem to
>handle chess programs more efficiently than Palm devices.
>
>Clive
I have no doubt of it. The question is how much faster it was really running,
since the question isn't only one of clock speed but also the type of processor.
See http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?454958 and run those
positions to compare the times you get with the times I published. I'd honestly
like to know.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.