Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:48:42 10/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2005 at 01:10:56, Gabor Szots wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>we would like to test this setting (called for example Fruit 2.2 (Uri) in CEGT >>40/40 (2 Ghz). So if anyone who owns Fruit could help us as guest tester this >>would be appreciated. It would also show support for an author who always is >>friendly to everyone and did a lot for the advance of computer chess and also >>gave us a very strong free engine with Fruit 2.1. >> >>In case of interest please write to hvankempen at web dot de >> >>Of course permanent testers are also welcome. >> >>http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/ >> >>Best Regards >>Heinz > >Hi Heinz, > >Please remember what Joachim said in this forum not long ago: they are going to >modify the search so that tuning parameters for the current Fruit may be >fruitless since the result won't be applicable to future Fruits. > >Gábor Do you mean for the following post http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?455761 "Btw we are refining history pruning anyway so tuning the threshold now before we make refinemenst is not useful." I think that this post does not say that tuning parameters for the current fruit is fruitless but only that tuning history pruning may be not useful for future fruit. I wonder if the post of Joachim means that we can expect some changes(hopefully improvements) in the next free update of fruit that is not based on adding tablebases. I see no information about it in the page of future plans in http://www.fruitchess.com/future-plans.htm Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.