Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:50:13 10/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2005 at 07:48:52, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >On October 16, 2005 at 07:21:30, billiau wrote: > >> >>I think the threshold change (50) is clearly more important than kingside (104). >>But i have not separate results for the two things. >> >>I understand the need to control the parameters individually. >>We should accept the Fruit team choice. >> >>Perhaps kingside helps against agressive opponents (like Fritz9). >>But i have not sufficient results for this. >> >>G. Billiau > >Hi, > >to increase KingSafety is surely also worth a try. There are aggressive >opponents like the new Fritz, Junior, Loop List. > >But CEGT CPU ressources regrettably are limited and setting test therefore is >author´s choice. > >Thanks for telling about your experiences. > >Best Regards >Heinz I did not know that you already started testing and already have results. Can I understand from your post that history threshold=50 is the only change in the Uri setting?(note that it is the only change that I suggested) Result seems good so far and I hope that fruit can keep 50 elo advantage relative to Fritz9. I read in another forum the following words(original words are in hebrew and I did translation to english in this post): "In my opinion for most people there is no justification to spend 35$ for an engine with no interface even if it is 30 elo stronger than Fritz9. It is better to buy Fritz9 for the same money because it comes with a nice interface and a lot of possibilities to analyze" Maybe if Fabien makes it more than 50 elo better then it will convince more people to buy Fruit(remember that we can hope that the update with tablebases is going to be stronger than Fruit Uri setting). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.