Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:38:46 10/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2005 at 16:01:34, Thomas Logan wrote: >On October 17, 2005 at 15:18:15, Ray Banks wrote: > >>And I think is a tougher opponent at long time control. Shredder could still >>take victory ultimately, but depends how many games you need to run top open up >>a decent margin either way. Possibly they may just stay within a point of each >>other forever... > >Yes I agree and have always believed it necessary to test Shredder at classical >time control > >Fruit is very strong and the match may go either way. I would not be suprised to >see Shredder eventually take the lead nor would it surprise to see Fruit triumph > > > >Tom If Shredder cannot take the lead after enough games then it means that it's learning does not work. I think that fruit is the stronger engine for analysis but it has no learning to help it in matches. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.