Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 15:54:33 10/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2005 at 17:38:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 17, 2005 at 16:01:34, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On October 17, 2005 at 15:18:15, Ray Banks wrote: >> >>>And I think is a tougher opponent at long time control. Shredder could still >>>take victory ultimately, but depends how many games you need to run top open up >>>a decent margin either way. Possibly they may just stay within a point of each >>>other forever... >> >>Yes I agree and have always believed it necessary to test Shredder at classical >>time control >> >>Fruit is very strong and the match may go either way. I would not be suprised to >>see Shredder eventually take the lead nor would it surprise to see Fruit triumph >> >> >> >>Tom > >If Shredder cannot take the lead after enough games then it means that it's >learning does not work. > >I think that fruit is the stronger engine for analysis but it has no learning >to help it in matches. > >Uri Hi Uri Do you know what the learning file(s) are for cb and Shredder classic pr and pl ? Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.