Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is it a bug in Movei(what is your opinion?)

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 19:06:30 10/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 17, 2005 at 21:07:48, Marc-Olivier Moisan-Plante wrote:

>On October 17, 2005 at 19:48:06, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On October 17, 2005 at 19:31:17, Marc-Olivier Moisan-Plante wrote:
>>
>>>On October 17, 2005 at 18:47:08, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think that the onus to claim the draw is upon the one in an inferior position.
>>>>
>>>>From:
>>>>http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=EE101
>>>>
>>>>We have this:
>>>>"5.2  The game is drawn when the player to move has no legal move and his king
>>>>is not in check. The game is said to end in `stalemate`. This immediately ends
>>>>the game, provided that the move producing the stalemate position was legal.
>>>>
>>>>The game is drawn when a position has arisen in which neither player can
>>>>checkmate the opponent`s king with any series of legal moves. The game is said
>>>>to end in a `dead position`. This immediately ends the game, provided that the
>>>>move producing the position was legal.
>>>>
>>>>The game is drawn upon agreement between the two players during the game. This
>>>>immediately ends the game. (See Article 9.1)
>>>>
>>>>The game may be drawn if any identical position is about to appear or has
>>>>appeared on the chessboard at least three times. (See Article 9.2)
>>>>
>>>>The game may be drawn if each player has made at least the last 50 consecutive
>>>>moves without the movement of any pawn and without any capture. (See Article
>>>>9.3)"
>>>>
>>>>And then this:
>>>>"Article 9: The drawn game
>>>>9.1  A player wishing to offer a draw shall do so after having made a move on
>>>>the chessboard and before stopping his clock and starting the opponent`s clock.
>>>>An offer at any other time during play is still valid, but Article 12.5 must be
>>>>considered. No conditions can be attached to the offer. In both cases the offer
>>>>cannot be withdrawn and remains valid until the opponent accepts it, rejects it
>>>>orally, rejects it by touching a piece with the intention of moving or capturing
>>>>it, or the game is concluded in some other way.
>>>>
>>>>The offer of a draw shall be noted by each player on his scoresheet with a
>>>>symbol (See Appendix E13).
>>>>
>>>>A claim of a draw under 9.2, 9.3 or 10.2 shall be considered to be an offer of a
>>>>draw.
>>>>
>>>>9.2  The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by the player having the move, when
>>>>the same position, for at least the third time (not necessarily by a repetition
>>>>of moves)
>>>>
>>>>is about to appear, if he first writes his move on his scoresheet and declares
>>>>to the arbiter his intention to make this move, or
>>>>
>>>>has just appeared, and the player claiming the draw has the move.
>>>>
>>>>Positions as in (a) and (b) are considered the same, if the same player has the
>>>>move, pieces of the same kind and colour occupy the same squares, and the
>>>>possible moves of all the pieces of both players are the same.
>>>>Positions are not the same if a pawn that could have been captured en passant
>>>>can no longer in this manner be captured or if the right to castle has been
>>>>changed temporarily or permanently.
>>>>
>>>>9.3  The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by the player having the move, if
>>>>
>>>>he writes his move on his scoresheet, and declares to the arbiter his intention
>>>>to make this move which shall result in the last 50 moves having been made by
>>>>each player without the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or
>>>>
>>>>the last 50 consecutive moves have been made by each player without the movement
>>>>of any pawn and without any capture.
>>>>
>>>>9.4  If the player makes a move without having claimed the draw he loses the
>>>>right to claim, as in Article 9.2 or 9.3, on that move.
>>>>
>>>>9.5  If a player claims a draw as in Article 9.2 or 9.3, he shall immediately
>>>>stop both clocks. He is not allowed to withdraw his claim.
>>>>
>>>>If the claim is found to be correct the game is immediately drawn.
>>>>
>>>>If the claim is found to be incorrect, the arbiter shall add three minutes to
>>>>the opponent`s remaining time. Additionally, if the claimant has more than two
>>>>minutes on his clock the arbiter shall deduct half of the claimant`s remaining
>>>>time up to a maximum of three minutes. If the claimant has more than one minute,
>>>>but less than two minutes, his remaining time shall be one minute. If the
>>>>claimant has less than one minute, the arbiter shall make no adjustment to the
>>>>claimant`s clock. Then the game shall continue and the intended move must be
>>>>made.
>>>>
>>>>9.6  The game is drawn when a position is reached from which a checkmate cannot
>>>>occur by any possible series of legal moves, even with the most unskilled play.
>>>>This immediately ends the game, provided that the move producing this position
>>>>was legal."
>>>>
>>>>I think that the most salient part is:
>>>>"9.4  If the player makes a move without having claimed the draw he loses the
>>>>right to claim, as in Article 9.2 or 9.3, on that move."
>>>>
>>>>It seems clear enough that if the draw is not claimed, you can still win the
>>>>game.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes and actually the widely cited theorem by Zermelo, which states
>>>(approximatively) that chess could be solved in theory by the minmax algorithm
>>>because it is a finite game of perfect information, doesn't apply to chess.
>>>According to the actual FIDE rules, chess is potentially an infinite game and
>>>even from a theoretical point of view one cannot solve it backward.
>>
>>The theorem assumes optimal play (e.g both players are trying their best).  If
>>they cooperate to lengthen the game, then it can become infinitely long.
>>
>>However, if both players are trying to either win or draw if that is their best
>>opportunity, then the maximum length is less than 6000 full moves.
>
>
>It is optimal to play on if you cannot lose; no cooperation is needed to get an
>infinite game. If you know you cannot win a position against optimal play it is
>because you solved chess using another theorem than Zemerlo's.
>
>By any chance, do you remember the reference about your second paragraph? I'm
>curious about it.

It contains what is perhaps an unwarranted assumption:
That the players know the game is drawn when it is drawn.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.