Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My Great Predecessors

Author: Telmo C. Escobar

Date: 19:30:02 10/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 16, 2005 at 23:23:34, Doug V wrote:

>On October 16, 2005 at 20:40:28, John Jack wrote:
>>
>>The game that I chose was L. Stein - S. Furman; from the 37th URS Championships,
>>1969. (Game # 68, page # 253 - of the English edition.) On first blush, the
>>analysis appears to be very detailed and well done. However upon deeper
>>inspection the authors only updated previous analysis ... and did not do a very
>>good job. I found somewhere between 15-20 errors, and these range from only
>>minor all the way up to jaw-dropping blunders and oversights. Space would not
>>allow a comprehensive review or analysis here, I will confine myself to just a
>>few examples to make a point.
>>
>>The computer likes the move 14...Qb6; however the authors quote a game where
>>this was played and Black lost horribly. (Smirin - Gelfand; Sverdlovsk; 1987.)
>>The authors make no comment on the moves of this game, but 17...Kc8?? was a
>>terrible mistake, any analysis engine will confirm that taking with the Bishop
>>was forced.
>>
>>Nor is this the only failure by the annotators, I will not dabble with many of
>>the smaller mistakes and oversights, but save those for my web page. 17.dxc6
>>appears to be a routine re-capture, but White had 17.Qe8+!! winning very
>>rapidly. (The authors make absolutely no comment at all at this point.) Nor is
>>this the only time that I found an improvement, I found at least five major
>>improvements over the game or analysis ... many of these required no real work,
>>only some close scrutiny with an analysis engine.
>
>Please explain how 17.Qe8 wins rapidly.  I see the variation 17...Nxe8 18.Rxe8+
>Qd8 19.Rxd8+ Kc7 20.dxc6 Rxd8 21.Bxd8+ Kxd8 22.cxd7 Kxd7 23.Ra3 Be7 24.Rxb3 a5
>and White still has a tough task converting the extra pawn in an ending.
>Practically, in terms of Stein's style, his choice makes more sense, keeping the
>queens on the board and using the exposed nature of Black's king.  Am I missing
>something?


 After your analysis  (24...a5) White should have an easy win by means of
25.Rb7+ Ke6 26.Rb5 Bd8 27.b4. It is probably impossible to know if Stein played
otherwise because of his style, or if he simply miscalculated something.

 Telmo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.