Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: What is the reason that the CEGT prefers testing CM personalities?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 23:08:06 10/17/05


From Heinz van Kempen's words:
>The majority of CEGT testers is not so keen on testing personalities, but Fruit
>is a special case.

I do not see that fruit is a special case based on the list.
Based on looking at the list it seems that the only special case is chessmaster.

Fruit has only one personality in the list except the default and I guess that
it is not going to have more than it when chessmaster has 10 personalities in
the list except the default.

Of course it is the testers choice what to test but
I wonder what is the reason that they prefer testing chessmaster.

I counted 10 different personalities except the default and it is not clear if
even one of them is stronger than the default when the possible error in the
default's rating is 23 elo points.

13 CM10th Milan 2.3 2679
14 CM10th Pestilence 2678
15 CM10th Behemoth 2676
16 CM10th Cell 2676
20 CM10th Imperator 2665
21 CM10th Default 2664
26 CM10th Berean 5.54 2650
27 CM10th Steadfast 2643
30 CM10th Behemoth II 2634
34 CM10th D1Meandros 2628
35 CM10th Yoda 2.5 2627

Uri
Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.