Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Proof

Author: Christian Koch

Date: 04:09:02 10/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 2005 at 06:05:48, Uri Blass wrote:

>>Not under these conditions if you look - "no books"
>
>You may be right but this is not the CEGT conditions and they use the condition
>of starting from predefined book positions.

Uups, did i miss something. Who told you that the testers within CEGT only use
predefined book positions?

I play with Nunn2 openings, with 8 moves.ctg, with 5 moves.cth, with remis.ctg
and so on.

>
>A program that is better with no book at longer time control may be not better
>when you use some small book.
>
>You have some evidence to support the opinion that chessmaster default may be
>relatively worse at long time control but not enough to prove it even if we want
>only 95% certainty.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.