Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:33:00 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 07:13:04, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >On October 18, 2005 at 06:41:35, billiau wrote: > >>Due to the results i saw in the CEGT list against Spike10a Mainz. >>I had some doubts about my own testing in blitz so i ran another test this >>night. >>See below what is the result (70% for FruitHist50 same as Fruit Uri) : >>I known it's only blitz games but i just would like to verify i did not dream. >> >>Arena tournament >>Rank Engine Score Fr Sp S-B >>1 FruitHist50 28,0/40 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· · >>11==01010111011=010101==11011111=11==111 336,00 >>2 Spike10a 12,0/40 00==10101000100=101010==00100000=00==000 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· >>·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· · 336,00 >> >>40 games played / Tournament finished >>Tournament start: 2005.10.18, 05:56:57 >>Latest update: 2005.10.18, 12:12:26 >>Site/ Country: ANTEC, France >>Level: Blitz 4/2 >>Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+ 2104 MHz with 511 MB Memory >>Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) >>PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn >>Table created with: Arena 1.1 > >Hi, > >there is of course no doubt that the Fruit setting is stronger. It is sometimes >only a question of having enough games. > >In the second match here Fruit 2.2 Uri is leading by 9,5:0,5 against Spike. >Surely this result is too good, as the other one before was too bad. Combining >many gives the right picture for each match. > >Best Regards >Heinz Previous Spike match was run by Christian who use different hardware. I do not know if spike and fruit get the same speed change from the different hardware that you use. Constructing a table of speed of different programs in nodes per second for every tester may be productive. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.