Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Proof

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 05:57:24 10/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 2005 at 08:37:20, Christian Koch wrote:

>On October 18, 2005 at 08:14:05, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 18, 2005 at 07:09:02, Christian Koch wrote:
>>
>>>On October 18, 2005 at 06:05:48, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Not under these conditions if you look - "no books"
>>>>
>>>>You may be right but this is not the CEGT conditions and they use the condition
>>>>of starting from predefined book positions.
>>>
>>>Uups, did i miss something. Who told you that the testers within CEGT only use
>>>predefined book positions?
>>>
>>>I play with Nunn2 openings, with 8 moves.ctg, with 5 moves.cth, with remis.ctg
>>>and so on.
>>
>>This is exactly what i mean by predefined book positions.
>>
>>
>>There is some opening that testers use that are not related to the opening book
>>of the engines.
>>
>>Uri
>
>And engines without book have to play without book?
>
>Please tell us your exact problem with the openings used in CEGT, perhaps we can
>help you. Is something unfair with these openings from your point of view? If
>yes tell us.
>
>best regards,
>Christian

I did not say that something is unfair.
I only said that games without book from the opening position are different than
CEGT conditions when engines start from different positions.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.