Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: KRRNKRR win in 290: a new record

Author: GuyHaworth

Date: 08:04:13 10/18/05

Go up one level in this thread

The question of the deepest 'Mate in N' Chess Problem must be answered in Jeremy
Morse's book on 'Chess Records' which I regret I do not have.

I think I've seen Chess Problems 'N' > 100, maybe > 200.


There aren't any 64-piece EGTs, assuming we start from the standard initial
chess position, but what is maxDTZ for 32-piece EGTs?


I don't see why you say that there are no positions with maxDTZ > 243*3.

I had not realised that (KRNKNN's maxDTZ =) 243 = 3^5, but suggest that this is
not significant.

g

• Re: KRRNKRR win in 290: a new record Yakov Konoval 21:20:10 10/18/05
  • Illegal position? GuyHaworth 00:02:11 10/19/05
    • Re: Illegal position? Uri Blass 00:19:05 10/19/05
      • Doh! Thanks - 8 captures needed GuyHaworth 08:07:57 10/19/05
  • Re: KRRNKRR win in 290: a new record Uri Blass 22:41:18 10/18/05
    • Re: KRRNKRR win in 290: a new record Yakov Konoval 23:21:42 10/18/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.