Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 13:04:30 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Uri, this was a very long game and I do not know what happens then with depth search in the end. Maybe time trouble, maybe something else. I will try to reproduce. I do not suspect a hardware error here, as especially in this match run by me Fruit 2.2 got one of the best scores. Additionally I can tell that there is no hash bug for this version. This was checked many times. I have to tell that I am slowly getting tired to answer to posts doubting in performance of the setting or the conditions, because it is still not clear. My goal is not to please you, although the history threshold reduce was your idea, but to give the Fruit team clues what to adapt or not and it may well be that history threshold reducement can be productive when testing only a few positions. Maybe it will produce also bad moves when good moves were chosen with history threshold=70. Did you also test this? Overall I got more decent results for this setting this evening (still not included in the list) and probably it will be close and comparable to default. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.