Author: chandler yergin
Date: 13:52:09 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 16:34:53, Rick Hagen wrote: >On October 18, 2005 at 16:29:07, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On October 18, 2005 at 16:24:25, Rick Hagen wrote: >> >>>On October 18, 2005 at 16:15:01, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>> Of course no good probram or bad program would choose that move. >>>>Ne5 is 4th choice. Only if that was the PV the engine was lookng at when the >>>>time allocation software made it move. >>> >>>The problem is that in MultiPV it_will_change its first move to Kg8 after a >>>while... but its eval is almost the same to Ne5! (-0.4x something) >> >>No it's not.. let the engine run for a few seconds. > >I let it run for 20 seconds. >Should be time enough to find it gives a piece away no? >Maybe I should run it for 1 hour? > >But I will run it in MultiPV mode untill it sees a clear difference, and I will >post the time okay? > >Rick Please do it Analysis mode; that way you can 'clip & paste' the Analysis. It you do it in Engine mode you can only 'cut & paste' the analysis. You'll see the difference. Also when Copying the position into the Message do a [D] in front of the Fen. Thanks very much I appreciate your offer. Chan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.