Author: Rick Hagen
Date: 13:52:25 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 16:34:53, Rick Hagen wrote: >On October 18, 2005 at 16:29:07, chandler yergin wrote: > >>On October 18, 2005 at 16:24:25, Rick Hagen wrote: >> >>>On October 18, 2005 at 16:15:01, chandler yergin wrote: >>> >>>> Of course no good probram or bad program would choose that move. >>>>Ne5 is 4th choice. Only if that was the PV the engine was lookng at when the >>>>time allocation software made it move. >>> >>>The problem is that in MultiPV it_will_change its first move to Kg8 after a >>>while... but its eval is almost the same to Ne5! (-0.4x something) >> >>No it's not.. let the engine run for a few seconds. > >I let it run for 20 seconds. >Should be time enough to find it gives a piece away no? >Maybe I should run it for 1 hour? > >But I will run it in MultiPV mode untill it sees a clear difference, and I will >post the time okay? > >Rick After 13(!) minutes: P4 3.0Ghz HT=128MB TBs off New game, Blitz:5' Netherlands 1n1r3k/1p1n4/2p5/8/3B4/8/4K3/R7 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 9: 1. ³ (-0.48): 1...Ne5 2.Bxe5+ Kh7 3.Ra7 Nd7 4.Rxb7 Kg6 5.Bd4 Nf6 6.Bxf6 Kxf6 2. ³ (-0.48): 1...Kg8 2.Rg1+ Kf7 3.Rf1+ Ke6 4.Rb1 b5 5.Ba1 Ne5 6.Rb3 Nd3 7.Rc3 c5 8.Ke3 c4 3. ³ (-0.46): 1...Kh7 2.Bc3 b5 3.Rb1 Kg6 4.Kd2 Nf6+ 5.Kc2 Nd5 6.Rg1+ Kf5 7.Be1 Ne3+ 8.Kb3 Rd3+ 9.Kb2 Maybe I should give it a day to see something isn't okay in its eval... Or it sees something we don't? Or you're in denial? Or you're just trolling? Rick (will email chessbase about this bug)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.