Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:34:45 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 16:31:45, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Hi Uri, > >okay, I did not read that post before. So there seems to be a bug that has to be >fixed. > >CEGT testers have voted now not to give any results for engines with less than >300 games in the future. There may also be an option to give authors concerned >access to a private forum to check progress of the test beforehand. > >We are doing this also to avoid speculations and nasty discussions and also do >not like suspicions of all kinds or critics against testers who maybe have >preferences for Chessmaster settings or whatsoever. > >Best Regards >Heinz I am also getting tired of answering posts like: "I do not suspect a hardware error here, as especially in this match run by me Fruit 2.2 got one of the best scores." Note that hardware problem may also reduce the results of colombus egg so the fact that fruit got a good score does not prove no hardware problem. It is no personal attack against you and against the testers but I guess that I am not going to post more comments because I do not want to post productive comments if I get responses like that response. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.