Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:07:50 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 17:44:15, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Hi Uri, > >normally I like your postings a lot and the discussion with you, but this time >it was obvious that you were trying to find something with any means. > >So I hope that it is okay to finish it now and you can be happy that you found >something and maybe now scrutinize games from other testers. When I want to find >something I can do this with any bigger database. > >I am very sure that the games material offered by CEGT testers is above average >and valuable info for many authors. > >Subject finished for me by now. > >Best Regards >Heinz I tried to find something because I suspected something was wrong. Imagine that some tester get Djinn 0.892c-Fruit2.2 10-0 I am sure that people are going to look at the games to try to find if something is wrong. It was not as extreme as the result that I suggest but it was enough for me to suspect that something is wrong. Note that the surprising results are not only of Fruit but also of Shredder Colombus that was supposed by sandro to be clearly better than the default and it seems now clear that it is not the case unless there is an hardware problem. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.