Author: chandler yergin
Date: 23:37:03 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 16:52:25, Rick Hagen wrote: >On October 18, 2005 at 16:34:53, Rick Hagen wrote: > >>On October 18, 2005 at 16:29:07, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>On October 18, 2005 at 16:24:25, Rick Hagen wrote: >>> >>>>On October 18, 2005 at 16:15:01, chandler yergin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Of course no good probram or bad program would choose that move. >>>>>Ne5 is 4th choice. Only if that was the PV the engine was lookng at when the >>>>>time allocation software made it move. >>>> >>>>The problem is that in MultiPV it_will_change its first move to Kg8 after a >>>>while... but its eval is almost the same to Ne5! (-0.4x something) >>> >>>No it's not.. let the engine run for a few seconds. >> >>I let it run for 20 seconds. >>Should be time enough to find it gives a piece away no? >>Maybe I should run it for 1 hour? >> >>But I will run it in MultiPV mode untill it sees a clear difference, and I will >>post the time okay? >> >>Rick > >After 13(!) minutes: >P4 3.0Ghz >HT=128MB >TBs off Activate tb and run PV > >New game, Blitz:5' Netherlands >1n1r3k/1p1n4/2p5/8/3B4/8/4K3/R7 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 9: > >1. ³ (-0.48): 1...Ne5 2.Bxe5+ Kh7 3.Ra7 Nd7 4.Rxb7 Kg6 5.Bd4 Nf6 6.Bxf6 Kxf6 >2. ³ (-0.48): 1...Kg8 2.Rg1+ Kf7 3.Rf1+ Ke6 4.Rb1 b5 5.Ba1 Ne5 6.Rb3 Nd3 7.Rc3 >c5 8.Ke3 c4 >3. ³ (-0.46): 1...Kh7 2.Bc3 b5 3.Rb1 Kg6 4.Kd2 Nf6+ 5.Kc2 Nd5 6.Rg1+ Kf5 7.Be1 >Ne3+ 8.Kb3 Rd3+ 9.Kb2 . > >Maybe I should give it a day to see something isn't okay in its eval... it sees something we don't? >Or you're in denial? >Or you're just trolling? > >Rick >(will email chessbase about this bug) They have On-Line Support, that may give quick results. You get to chat with a real person. ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.