Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:10:09 10/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2005 at 02:50:41, chandler yergin wrote: >On October 19, 2005 at 02:28:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 19, 2005 at 02:12:05, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?456535 >> >>It only says that Fritz9 is a strong engine. >> >>There is no contradiction between bugs and being strong. >> >>The bug is probably not relevant in more than 95% of the games but when Fritz9 >>gets the relevant position it can do stupid errors. > >You are basing a conclusion from one complaint. >You know settings are complicated, and there many menus. >You know how a Program searches & evaluates. >The user has not Cliped & Pasted the Position as requested. >After repeated requests and directions, it has not been done. >The user 'asserts' but provides no compelling evidence as requested. >This is not a Scientific method >Extrordinary claims require extrordinary evidence (Carl Sagan) The bug was also verified by another person see http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/135163.htm Fritz9 can find the right move after enough time but we can expect programs with no bugs not to blunder even at blitz in the relevant position. Additionally Fritz9 evaluates the position wrong and even after finding the correct move it still evaluates it as less than one pawn advantage for black. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.