Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:25:25 10/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2005 at 03:13:10, chandler yergin wrote: >On October 19, 2005 at 02:20:51, Mark jones wrote: > >>This is How Toag II 1.0 see it: >>New game, >>5rk1/6p1/P6p/3q4/1b6/2p1QNP1/2B2PKP/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Toga II 1.0: >> >>1.Bb1 >> µ (-0.86) Depth: 1/1 00:00:00 >>1.Bd3 >> ³ (-0.53) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >>1.Be4 >> ³ (-0.37) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >>1.Be4 Qa2 >> ³ (-0.64) Depth: 2/7 00:00:00 >>1.a7 Bc5 2.Be4 >> = (-0.18) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 >>1.Qe4 Qa2 2.Qh7+ Kf7 >> = (0.15) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 >>1.Qe4 Qxe4 2.Bxe4 Bc5 >> ³ (-0.32) Depth: 3/18 00:00:00 >>1.a7 Bc5 2.Bb3 Qxb3 3.Qxc5 >> = (-0.03) Depth: 3/18 00:00:00 >>1.a7 Bc5 2.Bb3 Qxb3 3.Qxc5 >> = (-0.03) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 >>1.a7 Qa2 2.Qe4 Bc5 3.Qh7+ Kf7 4.Qf5+ Kg8 5.Qh7+ >> = (0.00) Depth: 5/20 00:00:00 >>1.a7 Bc5 2.Qxc3 Kh8 3.Qd3 Qxd3 4.Bxd3 Bxa7 >> = (0.00) Depth: 6/29 00:00:00 88kN >>1.a7 Bc5 2.Qxc3 Kh8 3.Bb3 Qh5 4.Kh1 Bxa7 >> = (-0.09) Depth: 7/29 00:00:00 128kN >>1.a7 Bc5 2.Qxc3 Kh8 3.Bb3 Qh5 4.Nd4 Bxd4 5.a8Q Rxa8 6.Qxd4 >> = (-0.19) Depth: 8/29 00:00:01 316kN >>1.h4 Kh8 2.Qd3 Qxd3 3.Bxd3 Bc5 4.h5 Kg8 5.Be4 >> = (-0.18) Depth: 8/29 00:00:01 873kN >>1.h4 Kh8 2.h5 Bc5 3.Qxc3 Qxh5 4.Be4 Rf6 5.Qc4 >> = (-0.22) Depth: 9/29 00:00:02 1183kN >>1.Be4 Qc4 2.Ne5 Qxa6 3.Bd5+ Kh8 4.Qe4 c2 5.Qxc2 Rf6 >> = (-0.20) Depth: 9/29 00:00:02 1311kN >>1.h3 Kh8 2.g4 Rd8 3.Qe5 Qa2 4.Qe4 Kg8 5.Qh7+ Kf8 6.Qh8+ Qg8 >> = (-0.12) Depth: 9/29 00:00:02 1643kN >>1.h3 Kh8 2.g4 Rd8 3.Qe5 Qa2 4.Qe4 Kg8 5.Qh7+ Kf8 6.Qh8+ Qg8 >> = (-0.12) Depth: 10/29 00:00:03 2014kN >>1.Be4 Qc4 2.Ne5 Qxa6 3.Bd5+ Kh8 4.Qe4 c2 5.Qxc2 Rf6 6.f4 >> ² (0.30) Depth: 10/29 00:00:03 2452kN >>1.Be4 Qa5 2.a7 Bc5 3.Bd5+ Kh8 4.Ne5 Bxe3 5.Ng6+ Kh7 6.Nxf8+ Kh8 7.a8Q Qxa8 >>8.Bxa8 c2 9.Bd5 c1Q 10.Ng6+ Kh7 11.Nf8+ Kh8 >> = (0.00) Depth: 11/29 00:00:05 4001kN >>1.Be4 Qa5 2.a7 Bc5 3.Bd5+ Kh8 4.Ne5 Bxe3 5.Ng6+ Kh7 6.Nxf8+ Kh8 7.Ng6+ Kh7 >>8.Nf8+ >> = (0.00) Depth: 12/39 00:00:06 5859kN >>1.Be4 Qa5 2.Qd3 Kh8 3.Nh4 Rf6 4.a7 Qxa7 5.Qd8+ Bf8 6.Ng6+ Rxg6 7.Qxf8+ Kh7 >>8.Bxg6+ Kxg6 9.Qd6+ Kf7 10.Qd5+ Kf6 11.Qf3+ Ke5 12.Qxc3+ Qd4 >> ± (0.84) Depth: 13/39 00:00:19 17770kN >>1.Be4 Qc5 2.Qe2 Kh8 3.Nh4 Re8 4.Ng6+ Kh7 5.Ne5+ Kh8 6.Nf7+ Kg8 7.Qa2 Kf8 8.a7 >>Qe7 9.Bc6 Rc8 10.Nxh6 gxh6 11.a8Q Rxa8 12.Bxa8 >> ± (1.06) Depth: 14/43 00:00:39 39079kN >> >>(fdf, Home Ltd. 19.10.2005) > >Excellent! >Please note the difference between that and this: >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Ta7 Kg8 8.Tc7 Te8 >³ (-0.34) Depth: 7/19 00:00:00 72kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Ta8 Kh7 8.Ta5 Sd3 9.Ke3 >³ (-0.37) Depth: 8/19 00:00:00 169kN >5...Se5 6.Lc5 b5 7.Le7 Te8 8.Lf6+ Kh7 9.Kd2 Sbd7 10.Th1+ Kg6 >³ (-0.38) Depth: 9/28 00:00:00 490kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Tb1 Kh7 8.La1 Sa6 9.Lc3 Kg6 10.Th1 >³ (-0.38) Depth: 10/26 00:00:00 1234kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Ta7 Sa6 8.Kf1 c5 9.Ke2 Kg8 10.Tb7 Sc7 >³ (-0.38) Depth: 11/29 00:00:01 2285kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Th1+ Kg8 8.Tb1 Td3 9.La1 Sbd7 10.Tb4 Kf7 11.Lb2 >³ (-0.40) Depth: 12/30 00:00:04 6291kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Th1+ Kg8 8.Tb1 Kf7 9.La5 Td3 10.Lc7 Sbd7 11.Tb4 Kg6 >³ (-0.41) Depth: 13/40 00:00:11 15607kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Th1+ Kg8 8.Tb1 Kf7 9.Tf1+ Ke6 >³ (-0.43) Depth: 14/38 00:00:30 42044kN >5...Se5 6.Lc3 b5 7.Th1+ Kg8 8.Tb1 Kf7 9.Tf1+ Ke6 >³ (-0.43) Depth: 14/46 00:01:27 121127kN > >The Analysis should not start with 5.... The analysis can start with 5 in case that there were previous moves that the program remember The following analysis starts with 1 and also has the same problem http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/135163.htm Fritz9 avoids Ne5 in that analysis earlier but it still likes that move for some seconds and it still has illogical score. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.