Author: Albert Silver
Date: 08:13:51 10/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2005 at 03:10:09, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 19, 2005 at 02:50:41, chandler yergin wrote:
>
>>On October 19, 2005 at 02:28:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On October 19, 2005 at 02:12:05, chandler yergin wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?456535
>>>
>>>It only says that Fritz9 is a strong engine.
>>>
>>>There is no contradiction between bugs and being strong.
>>>
>>>The bug is probably not relevant in more than 95% of the games but when Fritz9
>>>gets the relevant position it can do stupid errors.
>>
>>You are basing a conclusion from one complaint.
>>You know settings are complicated, and there many menus.
>>You know how a Program searches & evaluates.
>>The user has not Cliped & Pasted the Position as requested.
>>After repeated requests and directions, it has not been done.
>>The user 'asserts' but provides no compelling evidence as requested.
>>This is not a Scientific method
>>Extrordinary claims require extrordinary evidence (Carl Sagan)
>
>The bug was also verified by another person
>
>see
>http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/135163.htm
And
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?456470
http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/135174.htm
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?456615
but the fact that he tells everyone they are wrong WHEN HE DOESN'T EVEN HAVE
FRITZ 9.... makes me repeat his subject title: "This says it all.... & That's
enough for me"
Albert
>
>Fritz9 can find the right move after enough time but we can expect programs with
>no bugs not to blunder even at blitz in the relevant position.
>
>Additionally Fritz9 evaluates the position wrong and even after finding the
>correct move it still evaluates it as less than one pawn advantage for black.
>
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.